
Gilchrist made the claim in his new autobiography 'True Colours', in which he also claimed Muralitharan had been afforded "political protection" during his record-breaking career.
In 2005 the ICC changed the laws of the game to allow bowlers "to straighten their bowling arm up to 15 degrees" - a figure that rendered Muralitharan's action legitimate. But Gilchrist blasted that decision, adding that while he said he did not begrudge Muralitharan his achievements, he believed the ICC made a mistake by not requesting the spinner remodel his action in accordance with the laws.
Gilchrist wrote: "When I heard that the rules would now allow degree of straightening - 15 degrees to be exact, a fraction more than Murali's straightening had been measured at - I thought 'That's a load of rubbish'.
"I don't think he's personally to blame: he bowled the way he bowled, and it was not up to him to do any more than he was asked.
"As much as I like Murali, my sympathies lay more with those batsmen, from every other nation, whose careers suffered because of a bowler who was in technical breach of the rules and seemed to enjoy a kind of political protection."
No comments:
Post a Comment